• RELEASES
  • VIDEOS
  • ARTISTS
  • NEWS
  • ABOUT
  • STORE

Monthly Archives: November 2008

Alex Machacek Conversations

November 25, 2008
Alex Machacek, News
Alex Machacek

Buy

Itunes-note


Amazon


Bandcamp

It has been about five years that I have been listening to Alex Machacek, one of my my very favorite guitar players. Originally from Austria, he now lives in Los Angeles with his beautiful singer and songwriter wife Sumitra. Alex has been teaching at Guitar Institute of Technology (GIT) and performing locally as well as globetrotting around the world with Jeff Sipe, Matthew Garrison, Virgil Donati, Marco Minnemann and others.

It has been a utmost pleasure to see this highly crafted guitarist grow as a musician. It just seemed the other day that late guitaritst Shawn Lane handed me “Featuring Ourselves” , a record that Alex did in his native Austria. Completely underground at the time, the record found its way to many hands around the world. His craftmanship was jaw dropping. I really had not heard something that interesting in a while.

After he moved to America, Alex recorded “[SIC]” , his first official worldwide release on Abstract Logix, and then a follow-up trio record – “Improvision” with ace drummer Jeff Sipe and the one and only Matt Garrison on bass, released in 2007 on AL as well.
Its just been a few years but these two albums have had some very defining moments in music and will continue to be heard for many years.

Alex has been recently hired by Eddie Jobson, the founder of U.K. to be the guitar voice for the new super band UKZ, which also features Trey Gunn, Marco Minnemann, Aaron Lippert. The band is scheduled to make their debut release and concert in 2009.

Someone like Alex Machacek does not come that often, and its not surprising that he gets accolades from guitar legends Allan Holdsworth and John McLaughlin among many others. In my mind, he is definitely one of the very hot candidates to write new chapters in guitar books.

Abstract Logix: It seems to be about 4 years that you have been living in Los Angeles. How have things been for you away from Vienna?

Alex Machacek: I have to say that I really can’t complain – which is a very untypical statement for a true Austrian!

AL: There has been a general view that for a young European musician to be for a lack of a better word ‘accepted in Europe’, you have to come to America to ‘prove’ it. Your thoughts on it?

AM: I can’t speak for Europe in general but coming from Austria there is a lot of truth to this belief. Austria is a small country with an enormous number of great musicians but it seems that the only style of music that Austria is really accepted for is classical music.
To illustrate, when I played in Japan I gave an interview for a guitar magazine and they asked me about the music scene in Austria – and they told me quite frankly that they have no idea what is going on there, because the only places they look at are New York, LA and maybe London.

AL: Alex, for people who follow your work closely, you have also proved yourself to be a great editor and producer and pretty smart engineer as well. Has it been out of necessity? Are you enjoying the experience?

AM:I have to answer yes to both questions.
Yes, it has been out of necessity for various reasons: a trivial one would be: budget…
But I also have to say that I really enjoy editing music, composing and recording around music. Sometimes this process can be quite tiresome and even frustrating because I am basically by myself throughout these processes, but on the other hand, I can dedicate as much time to any detail as I want. And sometimes I come up with stuff that wouldn’t have been possible in the typical “band in the studio” setting.

AL: Lets talk about “[SIC]”, a landmark record for you. Your collaboration with Terry Bozzio was one of the things that people came to know of. How do you reflect back on the experience?

AM: My collaboration with Terry started long before “[sic]” – in fact: some drum tracks on sic were leftovers from the “Delete and Roll” sessions.
I always enjoyed playing and working with Terry. He is a very unique musician and we had some great chemistry going on, especially live.
The other part: “[sic]” was a milestone for myself because I proved that I can make a record on a laptop – in a one bedroom apartment – in the middle of noisy Hollywood…

AL: The couple of days of making “Improvision” with the guys and then the editing and postproduction work after. Any stand out moments of the weekend, can you share with us?

AM: There were a lot of standout moments; Sipe and Garrison are wonderful musicians as well as people. We had some extreme technical difficulties in the studio but they never lost it – they always kept their cool. And the playing part was just pure joy. The idea was to just jam and get enough material so that I can finish the album at home – Matt and Jeff definitely gave me enough material.
I remember at the end of the session I wanted to have one ballad. I said to Matt: Let’s come up with a chord progression – I name the first chord, you call the next one and so on. So we came up with a neat little progression that ended up being the song Put me back to Sleep.
I took Joerg Mayr, a recording engineer and dear friend of mine with me to help record this album and I have to say without him we would have been lost.

AL: Lets talk about Sipe and Garrison, you guys seem to gel quite well?

AM: Let’s put it like this: Matt Garrison is not only a great bass player, he is also a source of creativity and everything a guitar player in a trio setting can ask for. Besides his insane chops he has such a deep sense for harmony and counterpoint, amazing!
And with Sipe it is quite similar – he always supports the band but he also opens doors to new directions if needed. Quite magical!
Before the studio sessions we played one improv gig in Raleigh (which unfortunately was not recorded) and this was pure magic. Neither Jeff nor I had played with Matt before but we created some very interesting, intimate and intricate music on the spot.
I felt comfortable and liberated from the get go!

AL: You played recently with Jeff and bassist Neal Fountain? Must have felt great to play some of your stuff live!!!

AM: Neil was the big surprise of the year. Matt couldn’t make those dates so Jeff suggested Neil. We met for a rehearsal which ended up with us just talking and getting to know each other. These are often the best rehearsals! And then we had 3 gigs where we played some material from the “Improvision” album but we also just jammed! And some of these impros were unbelievable to me. Take the first song on the live bootleg – which we entitled ‘Pinchproof’ – this was purely improvised but there is some serious harmonic depth to this piece. I remember when we played this I felt like I was flying and Neil was there to catch me!

AL: Alex you seem to have these trios that you are working with. Kai Eckhardt and Marco Minneman on the West Coast and I hear that you guys did some gigs as well in Mexico and LA. Let us in? What’s that like?

AM: Kai and Marco: this is a different vibe but it’s a great trio and I really enjoy being able to communicate in my mother tongue with these fellows. They shed a completely different light on my music. Marco comes from an entirely different background than I do, but we have some congruences.
Kai is a great bass player who I really enjoy playing with.

AL: Then we hear that drummer Virgil Donati has been gigging with you. He is a hot drummer…

AM: Virgil actually asked me to play in his band. We are mostly playing his tunes, which are challenging, to put it mildly.
Virgil recently asked me to do a European tour with Planet X – again, very difficult and challenging music but whatever doesn’t kill me makes me fat, right? That’s a literal translation from German! Just kidding!

AL: Alex Machacek with UKZ and Eddie Jobson. It seems that there was some buzz about it in 2007. I know fans are eager worldwide. How did that all go down? Where is that project currently?

AM: We are still in the process of completing an album. Recently the entire band actually met! I am only mentioning this because Trey Gunn and Aaron Lippert are doing their recordings remotely out of their own home studios.
The entire band rehearsed in LA and it was good to finally meet Trey Gunn and Aaron Lippert in person.
Eddie is now focusing on getting an EP released and there are plans for gigs in 2009. The full album will follow soon.

AL: I recently found out that you are working on a duet record with Marco Minnemann. Is that true?

AM: Yes, it is part of the Normalizer 2 project. Marco recorded a 52 min drum solo and gave this to several musicians to compose around. (John Czajkowski, Mike Keneally, Mario Brinkmann, Trey Gunn and me – Marco is also doing one version by himself)
My version and will be done by the end of this year. All I can say so far is that I’m enjoying the process and am excited every step of the way!
I remember I always wanted to do an album with just myself and my computer! Now it is Marco, me and the computer and occasional guest appearances of my wife, Sumitra. This album’s focus lies more on the compositional side. Some of the stuff on my version is simply not doable live – thanks to the punch-in option on my computer….

AL: Are you planning to do anything with your wife Sumitra? Indian Girl was refreshing on “[SIC]”.

AM: Yes, we are talking about a duo album as soon as the time is right, but we also are thinking of another band or ‘non-duo’ project. Since I am very busy now this will take a bit.

AL: What are your future plans? You already seem to have a busy schedule. Anything you care to tell us?

AM: I will do another drum recomposing CD but this time with a lot of different drummers. So far I have commitments from: Jeff Sipe, Gary Novak, Chad Wackerman, Minnemaus, Gary Husband, Herbert Pirker, Virgil Donati.
And then I am also thinking of doing a duos record – different duos….
And I want to do an album with Marco and Kai..
I am also working on writing an educational book…
Many, many plans…!

Latest album

Latest NEWS

SUBSCRIBE

Please Subscribe your mail to get notification from AbstractLogix.








Facebook-f


Twitter


Instagram


Youtube

Copyright © 2021 ABSTRACT LOGIX

Facebook-f


Twitter


Instagram


Youtube

Copyright © 2021 ABSTRACT LOGIX

Marc Rossi Interview

November 15, 2008
Marc Rossi, News
Marc Rossi

Buy

Itunes-note


Amazon


Bandcamp

Pianist Marc Rossi, a full-time Berklee College of Music professor, a composer, a working musician and a dedicated student of Hindustani and Carnatic music lives a life that finds him balancing all of these pursuits. The liner notes from his new CD “Hidden Mandala” say that, “he is treading that fine and rewarding line between teaching and learning.”

Among other impressive musical skills, Rossi is a fine progressive jazz pianist. But there are plenty of those people around. What sets Rossi apart is that he has found a way to integrate world music influences, most notably and deeply Indian music, into his jazz piano playing. True, there are many instrumentalists playing Indo-jazz. But, as far as I know, you can count on two fingers the number of pianists currently doing the same. That is because there is virtually no precedent for what Rossi and his west coast contemporary Stu Goldberg are doing these days. Indian music has no piano history. Ironically, these two western musicians are creating it right now.

Composer Rossi takes the conventions of Indian music structure and twists them around a bit to fit his western music and jazz needs. He is also finding ways to emulate the sounds of traditional Indian instruments through his bending of notes on piano and synthesizers. A good deal of “Hidden Mandala” is filled with the revelatory results of his efforts.

On “Hidden Mandala” Rossi leads a stellar group of musicians who interpret his compositions with advanced jazz improvisation and the hidden knowledge it takes to carry off the Indian and world music influences he has written into them. I was very impressed with what I heard. With an upcoming CD release party for “Hidden Mandala” scheduled for December 3rd, Abstract Logix thought it would be a great time to interview Mr. Rossi.

Walter: What is a Mandala and why is it hidden?

Marc: Good question. A Mandala can be many things, but basically it’s a symmetrical design of Indian or Tibetan origin that represents the universe and the seeking of wholeness or completion. It can picture deities, have patterns and meditation designs and / or tell a story. Some Mandalas – the kind I had in mind – can be viewed from different perspectives like a turning wheel showing that what’s front and center is always changing and evolving. This is often based on the viewer’s perspective. This perspective shows the circular and internal aspect of life rather than focusing entirely on a linear goal-oriented path.
The fact it’s “hidden” is a metaphor for things going on in life that are affecting you in ways you might not even be aware of. In Greek tragedy its counterpart would be deus-ex-machina. In my case, there was adversity in my life I had to understand and deal with. “Hidden Mandala”, metaphorically speaking, can be beautiful or dangerous. At the same time, the Mandala is a way into our deeper selves. It seeks to create understanding and unity.

Walter: You’ve studied all aspects of music. This has included composition, orchestration and improvisation. You have also formally studied Hindustani and Carnatic music and even the Lydian Chromatic Concept. Where did this musical inquisitiveness come from?

Marc: I’ve been curious about music since I was a small child. I love it to death, and it always fascinated me. It makes me feel whole, and it helps me get into myself and connect with the universe like nothing else. It takes me deeper in and also further out. It’s the Yin and yang.

Walter: Were your parents musicians?

Marc: My maternal grandfather was a piano teacher in New Haven, CT where I grew up. I started lessons at age 4. My mother exposed me to all kinds of classical music. As a small kid I loved Mozart. I couldn’t get enough of it – particularly the Jupiter symphony. I wore those records out. My father had beautiful recordings of Flamenco guitar which I loved too. This made me feel more exotic, powerful, soulful, noble, and rhythmic. At times I liked the Flamenco more. But the European thing had a bigger reach and an intellectual elegance I admired. I needed them both. Maybe it’s was like the Appolonian and Dionesian sides of my personality. I seek fulfillment through music.

Walter: When did you know the piano would be your life? What led you to NEC (New England Conservatory)?

Marc: Since I started piano at age 4, it’s always been there. But for a number of years I really wanted to become a professional guitarist. I still feel that’s an unfulfilled part of me. But then I decided I wanted to be a composer. That’s when I got serious about piano. I got very involved with Bach in High School. That clinched it. In any case, I knew at about age 11 music would be my life. I actually remember the exact day. I had just learned a new Beatle song on the guitar. At the same exact time I was thinking about the 3rd movement of Beethoven’s Pathètique sonata. I connected the two pieces in my head. I remember saying to myself, If music can get to me like this, I’ve got to get inside it and master it. It’s my very soul. I went too NEC because they had jazz and Indian music and I could get a degree in composition.

Walter: What musicians grabbed you and why?

Marc: I loved McCoy Tyner, Herbie Hancock, Bill Evans, Monk, Joe Zawinul, Andrew Hill, Joe Bonner, Chick Corea and Jan Hammer. There are so many more. I once visited Jan Hammer in 1973 in NY when he was rehearsing “Tales of the Exonerated Flea” with Horacee Arnold. Jan played me some Ali Akbar Khan at his place. So, he was clearly listening to Indian music too. McCoy has a beautiful African-like celebration of body, mind and spirit. His playing is very healing and unifying for me. Herbie has such beautiful color and groove and his time is so electric. It centers you. Plus he plays great electric keyboards which I love. I ignored Bill for years. I thought he was too “white-sounding.” When I grew up I realized how brilliant and subtle he was and that EVERYBODY was influenced by him! Charlie Banacos, my teacher, had a lot to do with helping me to appreciate Bill. Joe Zawinul is my hero. He was a total world musician. I would call him a universal sonic navigator. You were gracious enough in your jazz.com review to say my music is total world fusion. That’s what Zawinul did.

Walter: Are all your influences piano players?

Marc: No. I’m also very influenced by the composers Toru Takemitsu, Karheinz Stockhausen, Gustav Mahler, Bela Bartòk, and jazz composers Wayne Shorter and John McLaughlin, just to mention a few. I was into Indian music since I was in my teens and had my own path when I first started composing Indian-jazz fusion. But John’s pieces were a big influence. “Meeting of the Spirits”, “Dance of Maya”, “Birds of Fire”, and “Sanctuary” all influenced me. The way I harmonize ragas is also influenced by him. I teach a composition course at Berklee based on this fusion period. It includes Miles, Mahavishnu, Weather Report, Herbie Hancock, Chick Corea, and others. Other influences include sarodist Ali Akbar Khan, who is one of my favorite all time musicians, Ravi Shankar and veena player Balachandar. Since I play guitar and sitar, string instruments are a big influence. I also must mention my four teachers. I think they are certifiable geniuses. They are composers George Russell, William Thomas McKinley, Frank Bennett, and pianist Charlie Banacos. I cannot begin to say how much they have all influenced me and how much I respect them. They are all mentors. Frank has been more than a teacher to me. He has served as a role model too.

Walter: How did your interest in Indian music come about?

Marc: My interest in Indian music started with Ravi Shankar when I was about thirteen. Being a blues and rock electric guitarist, I loved bending notes and that’s what a sitar does so well. I also love modes and interesting rhythms. The sound of just the Indian intonation affected me too even though I didn’t know much about it at that time.

Walter: How did you incorporate it into the jazz I assume you were playing first?

Marc: Actually, at first I integrated my Indian music ideas into the rock music I was playing on both guitar and organ. But later I started using it in modal jazz.

Walter: Did you start with North Indian (Hindustani) or South Indian (Carnatic) music?

Marc: I first got into Hindustani music which emphasizes short compositions, lots of improvisation and a beautiful captivating lush mood. Later on, I got into Carnatic music with its beautiful compositions, strong rhythms and its flexibility in integrating Western instruments into an ensemble. I suppose my home base is Hindustani. But I like Carnatic equally. I certainly need them both. Again, I would say it’s about seeking a kind of Appolonian-Dionesian balance.

Walter: “Hidden Mandala” is much more than jazz with some Indian elements thrown in. But on the music on the album that does include Indian aspects, how strictly do you adhere to the cycles and other rules of the Indian Rag?

Marc: I actually take a great deal of liberty and poetic license. I use the Indian elements as I want to as a composer. It is a part of my jazz language, which is about managing the freedom. I don’t always follow specific rules, because it’s not Indian classical music we are playing. I believe that it’s my right and obligation as a composer to follow what I hear. Yet at the same time, the integrity of Indian ideas is clear. Distinguished Indian musicians like Lalgudi Krishnan and Satish Vyas immediately recognize my sources. However, there are definite times I do follow rag grammar if it fits the music. But this would still be in the context of remembering that this is creative Western music we are playing.
On the other hand, when my guest Geetha Bennett sings Raga Bhairavi (popular raga form) in my piece Voice of 1000 Colors Intro, she sang real Carnatic alapana (introductory) phrases that she adjusted and mixed as she saw fit to go with the Western instruments which were playing Bhairavi raga type phrases. The same is true for all the ragas she sings as background in the vamp section in “Blues for Frank and Geetha.” Also, some of the korvais (rhythmic cadences) such as the one in “Hidden Mandala” at the end of the drum solo are pure Indian phrases plugged into the fabric of the composition. Indian music is part of my pallet. I use it as I see fit melodically, rhythmically, harmonically, conceptually and more. The possibilities are endless as long as you know what you are doing and how to make it work.

Walter: Marc, there aren’t two many examples for musicians who want to play Indian music on the piano. You and Stu Goldberg are the only two Western piano players I know of that even attempt it. I don’t think there is a real history of Indian piano players at all. There is the harmonium I suppose and the electric keyboards and synthesizers that are used in Bollywood films. But not the acoustic piano itself… It’s just not part of the tradition.

Marc: These are great questions. Well first of all, I really started playing Indian music with guitar. Later on I went to synths and electric piano, and then to the sitar. But the idea of resonance – of having a big sonority – is similar. The pedal on the piano sustains and creates a rich world of sound color. It is almost like French Impressionistic painting. So it’s really a matter of what I am as a musician and how I explore this at the keyboard. As a composer I work my musical ideas out at the piano. I create from there. Also don’t forget I play synth a lot too. This allows me to bend notes. On “Hidden Mandala” I played more acoustic piano and MIDI piano than on my previous CDs. I seek on piano and electric keyboards a style that is influenced by Indian instruments like the sitar, sarod, veena, violin, and santoor – an instrument on which you can’t bend notes. That is a rarity for an Indian instrument. But what a sound! The resonance is haunting and irresistible.

Walter: You’ve gathered some wonderful musicians for “Hidden Mandala” and given them some challenging material. I must say the music is full of a joyful energy and power. I would call it a real fusion that fans of modern jazz, both electric and acoustic, would really appreciate.

Marc: To play my music well one has to be really open to new things and play these new things at a high level. You must be able to negotiate and integrate a multitude of styles. I remember reading that that was one of Joe Zawinul’s criteria for picking people for Weather Report. I humbly agree with that.

Walter: Well then, how did you go about selecting these musicians? Did they share the same affinity for this cross-cultural jazz as you or did you have to pull them in with you? Do you have to go over Indian music rules when you have them perform these pieces?

Marc: Well, I worked with these great musicians for years. As far as the core group of goes… Lance Van Lenten (sax and flute), Bill Urmson (bass) and I are all graduates of New England Conservatory whom I’ve played with for over 20 years. We share that common history. Lance and Bill played on my first Marc Rossi Group CD, “We Must Continue”. We all also took Peter’ Row’s Indian music classes at NEC, so these guys were totally open to new things. I’ve always had them in my band and I am glad they’ve been available.
I met Mauricio (Zottarelli) (Marc’s drummer) at Berklee in 2003. He’s amazing. I knew right then I wanted him in my group. He’s open to new ideas, plays any kind of groove, and has even studied some Indian music. Now he lives in NY and is in great demand.

Walter: You added a few guest musicians as well.

Marc: Yes. I invited guitarist Bruce Arnold who was in my earlier band and played on my “We Must Continue” CD. I really wanted him on this recording. We both studied with Charlie Banacos. His playing reflects the cutting-edge NY improvisational scene. He also understands 20th century classical music. He brings a superior level of awareness to whatever he plays.

Walter: The Indian guitarist Prasanna is phenomenal.

Marc: Yes. Prasanna is another amazing person. He is the only Indian born Indian classical musician I know who really knows Western music in depth. He is one of a handful who plays Carnatic music on the electric guitar. I wanted him to play on “Bittersweet Five,” since he does such a beautiful job with it. But I also have another CD that will be out in a few months with the same group on which he will featured on another cut named “Jazz Impressions of a Kriti.”

Walter: Some tunes feature Indian vocalizing.

Marc: Geetha Bennett, the wife of Frank Bennett who I mentioned earlier, is an “A” Top Rank artist (Indian classical music ranking) who plays the veena and sings. She is really an extraordinary musician. She’s toured and recorded with Trilok Gurtu and Andy Summers of the Police, among others. I originally was only going to have her sing on one or two tunes that will be out on that upcoming CD. But then I thought wait a minute. Why not have her sing on a number of them?” So that’s what I did, and it worked out beautifully. Geetha sings alapana style in the background and doubles some heads. That is something most Indian singers could not do.

Walter: I know all compositions are like children. But if you had to pick one tune from the album that would come closest to your ideal vision for your music – which one would it be?

Marc: That’s EXACTLY what I always say! My compositions are like my children! I love them all. Each one has its own unique character. This CD is about my compositions. They all matter. If I had to pick one though… I would say “Hidden Mandala”. It has lyrical melodies, a hip form, a groove, rich modal harmonies, orchestration, and some strange modulations that I hope will intrigue the listener. It’s a combination of freedom and discipline. We can play the composition verbatim with just short solos, or we can also really open it up for improvisation and really reach.
But as you said, the pieces are all my children, and I love them all for different reasons. I hope that they are all good and move people. It’s always interesting to see what pieces different people like. As with all composers, certain tunes seem to endure more over time. That’s part of the beauty of sharing your musical soul!

Walter: Jazz and Indian music are the predominate elements on “Hidden Mandala”. But they are only part of the mix. There are many other ingredients. How would you describe the finished recipe?

Marc: To me it’s like a “Sgt Pepper’s” concept. This is progressive jazz music interacting with a dream state of something else. This creates a coexistence of different dimensions. I try to integrate all languages to seek a higher unity among my musical parts and to create balance.

Latest album

Latest NEWS

SUBSCRIBE

Please Subscribe your mail to get notification from AbstractLogix.








Facebook-f


Twitter


Instagram


Youtube

Copyright © 2021 ABSTRACT LOGIX

Facebook-f


Twitter


Instagram


Youtube

Copyright © 2021 ABSTRACT LOGIX

Jimmy Herring’s Tackle Box

November 2, 2008
Jimmy Herring, News
Jimmy Herring

Buy

Itunes-note


Amazon


Bandcamp

Jimmy Herring’s Tackle Box
(Driftin’ on a Lifeboat – Pt.2)
by Rod Sibley

You didn’t really think I would talk to Jimmy for three hours and not talk about guitars, did you? – RS

Rod: So what guitars did you use on “Lifeboat”?

Jimmy: The main guitar was the one I play all the time. I don’t know what year it is – I’ve had it for 15 years. My friend Gene Baker, when he was working at the Fender Custom Shop, he made that guitar for me. He just had some spare parts layin’ around – it wasn’t really put together. Gene knew what I was into. He knew I liked all Strats, and that I liked humbuckers, too. So he just took some ’59 reissues – you know, like fake Les Paul pickups – and he put them in that guitar and…

Rod: He didn’t rewind the coils or change the magnets?

Jimmy: No. They’re just stock ’59 reissues. But he did wire it for me in a way that I prefer: which is two volumes and one tone. It’s sorta wired like a Gibson. Most people with Strats, they don’t wire it with two volumes, they wire it with one volume and two tones. I don’t like that because I like to use both pickups and then manipulate the volume of each pickup against the other one. And you can get some “in between” tones that you can’t always – I almost never use the bridge pickup by itself. I’ll put it on both, but I keep the bridge turned wide-open and turn the neck down just a little bit. What that does is, it lets the neck be dominated by the bridge. So it sounds almost like a bridge pickup sounds, but it’s just a fraction sweeter soundin’. The bridge by itself is really kinda harsh. If you EQ the amp to where it sounds right with the bridge by itself, then when you switch to the neck pickup, it’s muddy. ’Cuz you rolled off all the treble to get the bridge pickup to sound right. So I try and never do that, and just use the bridge pickup and the neck pickup together and manipulate the volume controls. That’s my No.1 guitar on this record.

Jimmy: I also used a Warmoth guitar, which is a guitar they made for me. I used it on a lot of stuff…

Rod: Strat style?

Jimmy: Yeah. It’s just a Strat body with the same Duncan 59 pickups. But it’s got a neck made of this wood called goncalo. You ever heard of it?

Rod: No??

Jimmy: It’s some weird wood that I’ve never heard of before. But they made me this neck and they sent it to me. I put it on the guitar, and I really liked it. I didn’t use it on a lot of solos, but I used it on the solo on “Gray Day”. And I used it on a lot of heads, like “Splash”. “Only When It’s Light” might be that guitar. And I used a Paul Reed Smith (PRS) with P-90’s…

Rod: The one with three P-90’s?

Jimmy: That particular one has three P-90’s in it, yeah. I wanted it to be like a big bad Strat, and that’s exactly what it is.

Rod: You know, I can never get a tone outta P-90’s. And I blame myself for it. You’re one of the few guys I listen to that can actually get a tone out of P-90’s.

Jimmy: Man it’s hard, you know. It’s funny – what about Strats? Do you like Strats?

Rod: I can’t deal with the necks. I play Gibson SG’s and Les Paul’s. But I’m an EMG player; I use active pickups instead of passives.

Jimmy: Okay, okay. I gotcha.
I can relate to what you’re sayin’, man. ’Cuz it is very hard. But certain amps and combinations of things can lead you to a little bit better place. Like when I hear David Gilmour from Pink Floyd; he plays Strats. Strats are edgy and like really not smooth sounding, they can really sound ugly. But in his hands, they sound beautiful. Of course, he’s processing the hell out of it. But the reverb is critical to gettin’ P-90’s to sound right; at least in my opinion. Same thing with Strat pickups. Another thing I learned during the making of this record is how important reverb is, man. I mean, you can take almost any tone – I mean you can take a real crappy tone – and if you put the right reverb on it you can make it sound good.
I’m not an active pickup guy. I like weak pickups and then let the amp do the work. I just feel like – for what I’m tryin’ to do – that you can hear the character of the guitar better with the weaker sounding pickup. Like a P-90 or a humbucker that’s basically a copy of a PAF; the ones that aren’t very hot. They seem to let the guitar’s character come through a little more. I’ve always found that you hear the pickup more than you hear the guitar with hotter pickups. And some of that is just a good amplifier, and partly the speakers, man. I did not know what a huge difference they could make. I never thought speaker were all that important until a few years ago. This friend of mine turned me on to those Tone Tubby speakers. I thought it was a gimmick: hemp speakers – oh yeah, yeah, yeah. “Wave your freak flag high”, you know. I’d always just used – well, I knew if I wanted a real, real clean sound I should use something like EV’s or JBL’s. And if I wanted it to break-up, use a 25W Celestion or whatever. I had limited knowledge on speakers. But my God, man! They can make a tremendous difference. This guy who made the Tone Tubby speakers is the premiere speaker re-coner on the west coast. And I had this Super Reverb – which is like my favorite amp – that had the original speakers in it. But they sounded really tired, ’cuz they were 1964’s. I was gonna get him to re-cone my original speakers. And he goes, “Maaan, I can re-cone your original speakers for you, but you really outta be using my speakers.” And I thought it was crap, right. But he made me a deal I couldn’t refuse. He said, “Look, if you don’t like my speakers, you can have them. You can sell them on eBay, or whatever. And I’ll re-cone your speakers for free if you don’t like mine. And I said, “Okay. I can’t argue with that.” He put those speakers in my amp, and I just completely freaked-out! I heard a “night and day” difference.

Rod: 10-inch or 12-inch?

Jimmy: There’s four 10-inch speakers in a Super Reverb. But man, the difference it made was so profound, that I was stunned. And I’ve never been that knocked-out by a speaker before, I never knew they could make that much difference. Super Reverb’s were my favorite amps, I love ’em. But there’s good ones and bad ones; and I thought I’d gotten a bad one. I thought, “This amp is a piece of crap, and I just paid 1200 bucks for it.”

Rod: Is this a “Blackface”?

Jimmy: Yeah. I was depressed thinkin’ that this amp sucked. You know man, he put those speakers in it – that thing became my favorite amp overnight. And that’s the one that I used on the majority of this record. It’s just amazing what those speakers can do. And ever since then, that’s the only speakers I use.

Rod: Any other amps and effects?

Jimmy: Let’s see: my 1960’s Fender Super Reverb; a Hughes & Kettner distortion box called a Tube Factor; and a Fuchs amp called a Tripledrive Supreme. Those were the only amps I used. I did use a Leslie on a lot of stuff. Bobby Lee Rogers plays through a Leslie, too. On one song, he was just taking the place of an organ; kinda compin’ rhythm.

Rod: Now that’s a cool retro sound. Was that a sound that you had in your head for a while?

Jimmy: I’ve had it in my head forever. I absolutely love guitar through a Leslie. But I don’t use it for solos; I was just using it for chords. Like in “Scapegoat Blues” when that chord progressions starts after the head, and you get that weird [sings part]; that’s guitar through a Leslie on those chords.

Rod: You use it on “New Moon”, too.

Jimmy: Yeah. The chords that start “New Moon” are Leslie’d. And then there’s – God, I think it’s in a lot of stuff… Oh! One thing we did that was really cool: you know those orchestrated sounds that sound like a fake string section? Everybody thinks that’s keyboards, but that’s guitar. It’s guitar goin’ through this little box called a Space Station. It’s just a little effects box with a little pedal on it. Somebody had given it to me years ago and it’s got this string patch in it – it’s kind of a fake guitar-synth kinda thing. I was workin’ on “Jungle Book”, and when we got in the studio I knew it needed some orchestration. I was gonna have a keyboard player to do it, but I had specific ideas for the voicings I wanted to use. And I hate tellin’ someone else to play my voicings. You know, it just doesn’t work: goin’ to a keyboard player and sayin’, “Here, do it like this.” I didn’t want to do that. So I figured I’ll try this little Space Station, and if it sucks, I’ll just get the keyboard player to do it however he wants. But I gotta at least try it to see what it sounds like. And I loved it! But when Jeff Sipe heard it, he went, “Man, what’s up with the dated string patch?” He didn’t like it. I think he grew to like it a little more, but he didn’t like it in the beginning. And when he said that, me and Rush just looked at each other and started laughin’ ’cuz he thought it was keyboards. I didn’t care if it sounded dated. I liked it because it was the first time I was able to orchestrate with my own voicings and get to hear what it sounded like in my head. And in one song, we put that Space Station through a Leslie; it was in that song “Transients”. If you listen to the bass solo you can hear it really clearly. During the bass solo, when it goes to the B-section it sounds like a Leslie rotating and swirling around. Most people think it’s organ. All the orchestration you hear is me on the guitar. But people think it’s keyboards, I’m sure.

Rod: Did you use a harmonizer for your unison lines on “Scapegoat Blues”, or did you track them?

Jimmy: No, no. I actually played it. It’s parallel harmony: I just played the same line like a minor-3rd lower. That’s why it sounded “pitch transposey”. That whole head is based on the diminished scale. And any line you play in that scale, you can play the same line a minor-3rd up or down, and it harmonizes with it. It stays within the same scale because it’s a symmetrical scale.

Rod: That’s a wicked riff. I figured you went through a harmonizer just to keep from having to play it over again.

Jimmy: It wasn’t hard. It’s just the same line a minor-3rd higher. I could have fussed over it and tried to make it perfect. It’s just for effect. I just did one pass through and it was like, “That’s good enough, just mix it low.” [chuckles]

Rod: So did producing and recording Lifeboat get you closer guitar-wise to the sound that you hear in your head?

Jimmy: Yeah, yeah. I mean, it got close. Especially the Super Reverb sound. You know, I also like the Fuchs amp. I used it on that solo at the end of “Lifeboat Serenade”. Fuchs amps are made in New Jersey. I got lucky: my friend Rush – the same guy that made Lifeboat with me – he works down at this back-line company called Crossover, down in Atlanta. And he said, “Man, there’s this amp down here you really need to check-out. It’s called the Fuchs Overdrive Special.” So I came down there one night – and Marshall had just sent me this new Marshall they had come out with to see if I liked it. I took that with me; I took my Super Reverb with me; and I think Mesa Boogie had sent me a Roadster or Lone Star. And we went down there and A-B’ed all these amps. And man, Jesus Christ! That Fuchs, it blew my mind! But we were in a room where everything sounded good. It was a “live” room; it had a lot of natural reverb in it. And there was no band there, it was just me. We were playin’ really loud in this tiny little – well it wasn’t tiny; it was a pretty big room, actually. But it sounded so good.
So the next day, I sent Fuchs an email basically sayin’, “I know you guys are probably not in the habit of people contacting you like this. I’d like to have a relationship with your company – I don’t know what I have to do.” Carolyn sent the email for me. Five minutes later the phone rang and it’s Fuchs: “This is Fuchs Audio, is Jimmy Herring there?” And I was like, “Whoa!” They gave me three amps, right off the bat.

Rod: WOW!! What did they send you?

Jimmy: The first one was an Overdrive Supreme. Then the other two were called the Tripledrive Supreme. They have three channels: they have a super clean channel, and then the next channel is kinda mid-way distortion, and the third channel is the high gain channel. But I never used the high gain channel – I mean, I use it with Panic all the time – but I didn’t use it on this album.

Rod: Well you’re gettin’ some great tones, man.

Jimmy: Thank you. I was using the middle channel of the Fuchs; that’s not even the full gain channel. But it’s cranked-up real loud to get that tone. “Lost” and “Lifeboat Serenade”, both of those are the Fuchs amp. And “Jungle Book”, “Scapegoat Blues”, “New Moon”, “Splash” and all that, that’s all the Super Reverb. They’re different, but they’re both pretty good. I’m pretty happy with ’em.

Rod: Did you guy’s do hard drive recording with Pro Tools, or use tape?

Jimmy: We love tape, and would prefer to be using tape in this situation where you’re not doin’ 70 minute long improvisations. When you’re just doin’ songs, it makes sense to use tape. But it’s just too expensive. So we just did Pro Tools. Rush has a lot of really good mic pre’s; and he has really good microphones; and he has really good… You know, he just has really good gear that gets you into Pro Tools. I mean, that’s the secret: those Neve preamps. He’s got pieces from Neve consoles that the mic’s go into before they hit the hard drive. He calls ’em “mic pre’s”; that‘s what they are, mic preamps. So, he’s got a bunch of good mics, he’s got good mic pre’s – and he’s got different ones. He’s got one called the Wunder’s. The Wunder’s is the one I plugged into to do “Gray Day”; I just plugged directly into it. He’s got a Neve, which we used on a lot of stuff. Then he’s got one called the Lunchbox. API is the company that makes it; you see it in every major studio you go in. API is a good company.

Rod: Did you use a combination of mic’s and DI for recording the guitars?

Jimmy: It was all mic’s. Except for “Gray Day”, that lead voice was direct. We just used two mics. We used a [Shure] Beta 57 – which is not one of my favorite mics. I would have wanted a “normal” 57. And Rush had one, but for some reason he kept wanting to use the Beta. And then the other mic is the standard 421. And that’s what most people record guitars with: a 421 and a 57. We used a blend of the two mics, we didn’t use one or the other. And it wasn’t 50% every time; it wasn‘t like half this mic and half that mic. Sometimes it was 60-40%, sometimes it was 75-25%. I was really impressed with the tones. I couldn’t complain about ’em at all.
At first we were recording my reverb, too. I put the source of the reverb in a different cabinet so it’s not cluttering up the dry signal. I’ve been doing that for a long time. Your main amp doesn’t have any reverb; you take a line out off the back of that and go into a digital reverb; and then return that to another power amp. And then that power amp is powering two more speaker cabinets that have nothing but reverb. That way, you still get a stereo reverb, but it doesn’t have any reverb in the dry signal. That way, the sound guy can separate one from the other a lot easier than if you had a lot of reverb coming through your dry cabinet. You do it that way too, so you know what I’m talkin’ about.

Rod: Yeah. I run my rack like that: in parallel rather than in series. I split the signal from the preamp into four outs, keeping one totally dry; send the other three to the effects, return from the effects 100% wet; and use a mixer to blend the one dry and three wet signals before they go to the power amp and speakers. I wouldn’t do it any other way, man.

Jimmy: Now, Rush kept tellin’ me, “Man, every time we record a guitar track for you, it’s four tracks.” Because it’s two mic’s on the dry amp, and then there’s two reverb mic’s. So when you start gettin’ to the place where you’re doin’ overdubs and you’re doing several tracks, it starts gettin’ really… I mean, Pro Tools, it doesn’t matter; you can do as many tracks as you want. But it starts to be a real pain to keep up with. And Rush kept tryin’ to convince me, “Dude, you don’t need to use your reverbs. I got reverbs right here that’ll sound just as good.” And I didn’t believe him! Because producers have been tellin’ me that, man, for years; and they were full of crap. I would hear it back, and I couldn’t even play because it sounded so bad. After about the third day he said, “Look. Let me prove to you that I can beat that reverb sound that we’re takin’ up all these tracks with.” And he proved it to me! I said, “Okay. You’ve done it.” So after the third day we didn’t record my reverbs anymore. He would just let me hear it; I could hear it when we recorded, but he wasn’t actually recording it.
You know what else is weird, man? I’ve never been able – never been able – to record in the control room. I mean, for clean parts I could. But for overdriven solos and stuff, what I’ve always done is I go in the room where the amp is and then put headphones on. And I get the band in my headphones, but no guitar.

Rod: Really??

Jimmy: Yeah, because the guitar is blastin’ in the room. So I don’t need it in the headphones.

Rod: Oooh. I gotcha.

Jimmy: What I do is just get them to put the band at a level where I can still hear the guitar.

Rod: I’ll bet Pete Townshend wishes he had thought of that idea a few years ago. [both laugh]

Jimmy: Oh my God. I can’t stand the sound of guitar through headphones. I mean, Pete just plays so loud. And I’m playin’ loud as hell, too – I can’t talk – but not “Pete Townshend loud”. And I love him, by the way.

Rod: Oh yeah! When we were talkin’ about P-90’s pickups, I was thinking about Pete playing a Gibson SG Special with P-90’s.

Jimmy: Yeeeah, man. I love that. Like the Live At Leeds album. But I could never play in the control room. For some reason at Rush’s house – I guess it’s because we’re such good friends; we’ve known each other for so long. He knows what he’s doin’. He knows how to get the tone I like. So this time, I did everything in the control room.

Rod: Any other toys?

Jimmy: I got this new guitar recently that’s just – God, it’s so beautiful.

Rod: What is it?

Jimmy: It’s a Warmoth. It’s a different one from the one we talked about. The other one is just a basic black Strat with a couple of humbuckers. This is a semi-hollow body Strat: it’s got an f-hole on one hollow chamber. I had gotten away from playing my PRS guitars. I started playing Fender’s again because I missed that 25-½ inch scale length. You know, you got 25-½ inch with Fender; you got 25-inch with a PRS; and Gibson’s are 24-¾ inch in general. So each one of them feels different and plays different. I’ve always played Fender’s my whole life, up until I started playin’ those PRS’s. And I went probably five or seven years on nothing but the PRS’s, and kinda forgot what Fender’s felt like. I started playing them again a little bit at home, and I was like, “Oh my God! I forgot how much I loved this!” The string tensions a little bit tighter because the neck is longer, so you have to bend it a little further to reach the pitch.

Rod: That’s why I play mainly Gibson’s. I’m lazy and I don’t like fightin’ with my guitar.

Jimmy: And the Gibson’s awesome. Except, what do you do when you get up high on the neck? The frets are too close together. That’s what I run into with Gibson’s. Like with SG’s – I love SG’s but…

Rod: Well, that’s what distortion is for, remember? [both laugh]
You don’t have to care about playing clean. The noise is there for a reason. You’re supposed to be playin’ up high and messin’ up.

Jimmy: Yeah. All those “clams”? That’s called “nuance”. [more laughter]
Hey man, that’s rock’n’roll.
The Fender’s, you know, the frets are far enough apart where I can get my little sausages in there. [both laugh]
For me, it’s hard to be articulate on a Gibson up high on the neck. I hear other people do it brilliantly. But for me, it’s just kinda hard. But the Fender scale length, I’m kinda hooked on it again. Warmoth is workin’ with me. They’re buildin’ me these different necks until I can narrow down exactly what I really, really want in terms of how flat the neck is; the radius of the neck. I read just recently that Holdsworth uses a 20-inch radius! I mean, a 20-inch radius is dead flat. Gibson necks are pretty flat, they’re like a 12-inch radius or something like that?

Rod: 10 to 12-inch; somewhere in there. But a 20-inch radius is flat.

Jimmy: 20 is dead flat. And I’ve never played a dead flat neck before. So I asked Warmoth if they would build me one. And they said, “My God. A 20-inch radius?! Nobody plays a 20-inch radius!” Do you know how long I’ve had to hear that crap from people?!
’Cuz I like this insanely huge fret wire called Dunlop 6000…

Rod: Oooh. You’re one of thooose guys.

Jimmy: I’m a 6000 guy. Everyone else uses 6400, or whatever. The 6400’s not tall enough for me. And then they make this wire called 6100, which most people call “jumbo” or “super jumbo”. But the 6100 isn’t wide enough; it’s tall enough, but it’s not wide enough. The 6000 is perfect for me. And I’ve been using it for twenty years. ’Cuz with tall frets people say, “What are you, crazy! That’s bass frets.” Or, “You’ll never be able to play in tune.” – that’s my favorite one. Now, there’s some truth to it: if you don’t have the touch right. If you push too hard, the notes will go sharp. And it is kinda hard to play chords in tune until you get used to it. But I’ve been gettin’ used to it for twenty years. And I’m tired of hearin’ people say that. There’s always people givin’ you crap about it.
So, I got them over the 6000 wire thing. And now I’m tryin’ to work on ’em on the radius thing. They think I’m insane.

Rod: I know what you mean. Like on acoustic guitar: I’ll take a standard set of extra-light gauge (.010 – .047) that comes .010, .014, .023; remove the .010; and use the .014 as the high-E string, and add a .017. So I’m going .014 plain, .017 plain, .023 wound. And people always say to me, “You can’t use a .014 as the first string, you can’t bend it!” And I go, “Yes, you can. If you can pull down to bend a .056 as a low-E, you can push up a .014 as a high-E; with no extra effort.” And people look at me like I’m nuts.

Jimmy: If you can bend a .014, then you’re my hero.

Rod: I’m not talking about bending it a fifth or some large interval.

Jimmy: That’s amazing.

Rod: It’s no big deal – at least, on my Ovation it isn’t. For me, those gauges feel even across the neck. There’s no “gap” in the transition from the wound strings to the plain. A .014 as a high-E only sounds like a big number in people’s minds. But it’s like what you’re talkin’ about with people hearing about a 20-inch radius neck.

Jimmy: Yeah. People think you’re crazy.
Have you ever messed with a scalloped neck?

Rod: A friend on mine had one, and I couldn’t play it. With nothing underneath, my fingertips felt like they were being sliced open.

Jimmy: Yeah, that’s wild, man. I mean, McLaughlin used one years ago on an acoustic.

Rod: Yeah. He used them on acoustics and electrics. But he studied the vina years before that. So he already knew how to play on a scalloped neck. I mean, he plays chords in tune on the thing!

Jimmy: I had Warmoth make me this neck: it’s standard all the way up to the 12th fret, and from the 12th fret all the way to the end it’s scalloped. And it’s fantastic. But the neck is too big for my hands. What I need to do is get another one made just like it, except for with a smaller neck. The neck is just too fat; it’s too much like a baseball bat. But good God, man, does it feel incredible! When you get up in the high range – now this is electric, obviously – but when you get up in the high frets, man, you can grab the notes. You got so much power. ’Cuz the scallopedness of it makes your little finger really strong. It’s easy for you to do powerful pull-offs with your pinkie way up high on the neck; normally, it’s not. But with scalloped frets, it makes it so much easier. And bending, man – God, bending is just a breeze with the scalloped frets. I wouldn’t want a whole neck like that. But from the 12th fret up, it’s pretty cool. It’s a shame that I gave them the wrong dimensions. But I didn’t know where to start; I didn’t know what was right, you know. But it’s okay, I can still use it for some things. I think it’s gonna help me in terms of, like, Holdsworth’s legato style; being really fluid. I think it’s gonna help me get stronger at that.
But right now Warmoth doesn’t make a 20-inch radius. They don’t even have a machine that will do that. And I was like, “Dang it! I really wanted to try a 20-inch radius.” The guy goes, “We only go as high as 16-inch.” So I asked, “What’s the difference between 16-inch and 20-inch?” He goes, “Man, it’s hardly noticeable.” And I said, “Okay. Let’s just try a 16-inch.” Fender necks are incredibly difficult to play unless you flatten them out some. About like a Gibson; like about a 12-inch radius. I’d like to get all the necks on my Fenders flattened out quite a bit. But there’s just not that many people you can trust to do it. You gotta be careful. You don’t want to give your guitar to some hack. [both laugh]

Latest album

Latest NEWS

SUBSCRIBE

Please Subscribe your mail to get notification from AbstractLogix.

 


Facebook-f


Twitter


Instagram


Youtube

Copyright © 2021 ABSTRACT LOGIX

Facebook-f


Twitter


Instagram


Youtube

Copyright © 2021 ABSTRACT LOGIX

Recent Posts

  • ‘THIS MOMENT’ AWARDED WITH GRAMMY
  • GRAMMY™ NOMINEE FOR BEST GLOBAL MUSIC ALBUM – SHAKTI’S ‘THIS MOMENT’
  • GLOBAL FUSION ALCHEMISTS SHAKTI ANNOUNCE NORTH AMERICAN TOUR
  • World Fusion Pioneers- John McLaughlin and Zakir Hussain mark 2023 return with Shakti 50th anniversary album and world tour
  • Wayne Krantz goes on tour exactly two years after the start of the pandemic

Recent Comments

  • irontemplates on Guns and Plants: Stardust
  • irontemplates on Carla & Bones: Trailblazers
  • irontemplates on Mantis: Glam Porn (Vinyl)
  • irontemplates on Love Elexir
  • irontemplates on Sweater The Rise

Archives

  • May 2024
  • December 2023
  • February 2023
  • May 2022
  • February 2022
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • February 2019
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • July 2017
  • November 2016
  • August 2015
  • May 2015
  • January 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • February 2014
  • July 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • December 2012
  • September 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • March 2012
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • August 2008
  • April 2008
  • February 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • March 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • September 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003
  • November 2002
  • October 2002
  • June 2002

Categories

  • Abstract Logix
  • Adam Nitti
  • Alex Machacek
  • Alex Skolnick
  • Allan Holdsworth
  • Andrea Marchesini
  • Anil Prasad
  • Avi Bortnick
  • Barry Cleveland
  • Barry Richman
  • Bela Fleck
  • Ben Monder
  • Bill Bruford
  • Bill Connors
  • Brett Garsed
  • Bunny Brunel
  • Chad Wackerman
  • Chris Beckers
  • Chris Poland
  • Chris Taylor
  • Chuba Aomori
  • Cindy Blackman
  • Colin D'Cruz
  • David ‘Fuze’ Fiuczynski
  • Debashish Bhattacharya
  • Dennis Chambers
  • Dewa Budjana
  • Dominic Miller
  • Dominique di Piazza
  • Ed DeGenaro
  • Ehsaan Noorani
  • Featured
  • Featured – John
  • Frank Gambale
  • Fresh News
  • Garaj Mahal
  • Gary Husband
  • Gary Wills
  • General
  • George Brooks
  • Gerald Gradwohl
  • Gergo Borlai
  • GIRLS DON’T LIKE REAL JAZZ
  • Gregg Bendian
  • Hadrien Feraud
  • Henry Kaiser
  • Hiromi
  • Hugh Ferguson
  • Ian Patterson
  • Jack DeJohnette
  • Jahloon
  • Jeff Babko
  • Jeff Berlin
  • Jeff Coffin
  • Jeff Richman
  • Jeff Sipe
  • Jennifer Batten
  • Jimmy Haslip
  • Jimmy Herring
  • John Czajkowski
  • John McLaughlin
  • John Molo
  • Jonas Hellborg
  • Keith Carlock
  • Ken Talve
  • Kevin Scott
  • Kirk Covington
  • Mandolin U. Shrinivas
  • Marc Rossi
  • Mark Egan
  • Mark Mondesir
  • Matthew Garrison
  • Mattias IA Eklundh
  • Michael ATONAL Vick aka VVV
  • Michael Landau
  • Mike Seal
  • Mitchel Forman
  • Nat Janoff
  • News
  • Ney Mello
  • Nguyen Le
  • Nima Rezai
  • Ohm
  • Oz Noy
  • Ozone Squeeze
  • Pandit Debashish Bhattacharya
  • Pat Martino
  • Paul Hanson
  • Percy Jones
  • Peter Fernandes
  • Prasanna
  • Rai Thistlethwayte
  • Rakalam Bob Moses
  • Ranjit Barot
  • Ray Gomez
  • Rez Abbasi
  • Richard Hallebeek
  • Rob Levit
  • Scott Henderson
  • Shakti
  • Shane Theriot
  • Shankar and Gingger
  • Shankar Mahadevan
  • Shawn Lane
  • Souvik Dutta
  • Stanley Clarke
  • Steve Khan
  • Steve Smith
  • Steve Topping
  • Stu Goldberg
  • Surinder Sandhu
  • T Lavitz
  • Terri Lyne Carrington
  • The 4th Dimension
  • The Mahavishnu Project
  • Tom Guarna
  • Tony Grey
  • Tony Smith
  • Trilok Gurtu
  • Uncategorized
  • Ustad Zakir Hussain
  • V Selvaganesh
  • Vernon Neilly
  • Vinnie Colaiuta
  • Walter Kolosky
  • Wayne Krantz
  • Wayne Shorter
  • Zakir Hussain

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

SUBSCRIBE

Music news delivered to your inbox

Follow Us

 
 
 
 

COPYRIGHT © 2023 ABSTRACT LOGIX